If yesterday's confirmation hearing for Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor was intended to be an educational experience for the nation, then you'd never have known it from the way that senators of both parties managed to dominate all but 8 minutes of the hearings with speeches or statements about themselves or their own views. Anyone watching coverage by CSPAN or other cable news networks had to be simply appalled that the nominee was given so little time to represent herself or her own views. Yet this is exactly the type of spectacle that confirmation hearings have become since CSpan or other news agencies began to move cameras into Congress for important hearings. Politicians of both parties play to the audience of viewers when such events are televised.
Television media had hoped to make important events more accessible for the public and better educate the public by moving cameras into government hearings some years ago. Instead, politicians now find that media gives them a free soapbox platform to run for re-election, or to some higher office. Part of the mission of CSpan has failed to educate the public because politicians have altered their behavior to use the media for their own benefit.
Some years ago, CSpan was hailed as a great educational breakthrough for the public appetite for information and as a means to make government's affairs more open. Instead, politicians have now found that this medium gives them new opportunities at self-promotion.
Back in 1967 , the great media author Marshall McLuhan's book THE MEDIUM IS THE MASSAGE seemed to view that the media surrounding us would act to shape our understanding and perception of the world around us as well as to affect our behavior. Whenever hearings are held in Congress, those who are given a platform to speak seem to be playing to the camera or to core groups of voters. It alters their behavior, and possiby their votes as well. The impact of moving cameras into government cannot be understated. Behavior of all types were altered forever when cameras moved into Congress.
Sonia Sotomayor was at the hearings for the purpose of seeking possible confirmation to the Supreme Court, while the members of the Senate were there largely for their own political benefits that the media presence can award them. The two goals are not entirely similar by any means.

Comments (2)
I just read about day 2, bu... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Chrystal K. | July 14, 2009 6:09 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I just read about day 2, but I didn't get a chance to read about day 1.
1. Posted by Chrystal K. | July 14, 2009 6:09 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 14, 2009 18:09
2. Posted by Paul Hooson | July 14, 2009 7:28 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hello Chrystal. Regardless of how one might feel about Judge Sotomayor, the hearings were supposed to be about her possible lifetime nomination to the high court, but instead day one was so dominated by senators of both parties soapboxing, that out of an entire 1st day, Sotomayor was allowed just 8 minutes of responses. But day two looked a little better. However, the long speeches that many senators give hardly rate as a question by any means.
2. Posted by Paul Hooson | July 14, 2009 7:28 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 14, 2009 19:28